Finnian Burnett

Author, Educator, Cat Person

The other day, I posted in the Canada Writes Facebook group—run by CBC Books—about something that’s been on my mind lately: the proposed defunding of the CBC, a political promise of Pierre Poilievre.

It’s interesting, and relevant to us as writers, that defunding the CBC is a political promise of Pierre Poilievre. I read today through Arlene Dickinson that the CBC costs, on average, 33 dollars PER YEAR per person. Considering I spend more than 33 dollars a month on streaming services, on writing workshops, on books, on other sources of entertainment, 33 a year seems like a ridiculous amount of money to base a campaign on.

For us as writers, the CBC, among so many other things, runs this page where many of us have found readers for our books, friends who beta read for us, writers we love, whose works we now cherish. Personally, I credit the CBC and the contest for inspiring me to build my skills, to work on my stories, to learn about revising and honing, to find ways to showcase my own voice in my writing.

I’ve heard of conferences through posts in this group where I’ve gone – conferences which changed my life – including the one where I met my agent. I wouldn’t have known about that conference if I hadn’t seen someone post about it in this group.

I found the Alexandra Writers’ Centre Society because of a post in this group, years ago, about their Writer in Residence program. I’ve since taught countless classes for them and have become a regular instructor which is one of the reasons I was able to quit my day job.

I found the publisher (Hi Off Topic Publishing) of my last novella-in-flash through this group. They are also publishing my next flash fiction collection. I found a connection with Storybilder here – a writing platform run by an incredible woman with whom I often nerd out about craft of writing, and for whom I write blogs for emerging writers.

Beyond that, I’ve met some of the great loves of my life in this group. People who bolster me, who share my work. People whose work I share and celebrate. People I’ve gone on retreat with, shared the sting of rejection with.

So, yes. Funding the CBC is important because of access to news and programs and Murdock Mysteries and that adorable show with the guy who plays George on Murdock. And for a million other reasons, but the most important reason is for 33 dollars a year, I have met the group of people who make me a better person, a better writer. Just better.

Thirty-three dollars a year gave me a writing life. I can’t imagine voting against that.

Welcome to the 5 Questions Series. Each week, I’ll ask five questions of some of my favorite authors, editors, publishers, and other industry professionals. This week, I’m talking with Robin van Eck about about what it takes to build a vibrant writing community, how the Alexandra Writers’ Centre Society is reimagining literary spaces, and why storytelling remains one of the most powerful tools for social change.

The Alexandra Writers’ Centre Society provides a space for writers of all levels, from absolute beginners to seasoned professionals. What do you think makes a truly inclusive and supportive writing community, and how do you cultivate that at AWCS?

All stories matter. It doesn’t matter whether you’re writing dark romance, high fantasy, poetry, memoir – something I have learned over my many years with AWCS is that no one person’s story is better than the next. We have tried to cultivate that at AWCS by being broad in our offerings – providing opportunities for people of all genres to explore and create in a safe and inspiring environment

AWCS actively works to remove barriers by offering grants and sponsorships—why is accessibility in the literary world so important, and how do you ensure these opportunities reach the people who need them most?

Writing—and art in general—is a way for individuals to express themselves in a very complicated and messy world. We write for a myriad of reasons: mental health, healing, processing emotions, understanding, entertainment. Everyone should be able to enjoy that no matter where they come from. But writing is often so isolating. What we build at AWCS, is a community that cares and supports one another—and that is healing on so many other levels, with or without the words.
We build stronger community by working together. In order to do that we explore collaborations with communities that wouldn’t normally have direct access to our programs and services, while also working with the various like-minded organizations.

AWCS took over the When Words Collide writing conference, one of Canada’s beloved literary events. What was that process like, and what is your vision for the future of this conference and other AWCS initiatives?

The process was fairly straightforward. When we heard the When Words Collide Society would no longer host the festival unless they found someone to take it over, and we heard the cries from the community, I approached them and said, hey what about us?
Though it’s not something we took lightly. It did take much deliberation by our board to ensure we had the capacity to take it on, not just the financial means and we needed to make a plan to ensure that this would be a success.
At the core of it, we want writers to succeed, we want to provide them the means, the tools and the opportunities to showcase their work and get it out to the reading public. What I always loved and admired about the When Words Collide festival was the energy and excitement that overcame the attendees for a weekend. I’d never experienced anything quite like it. Not a single writing conference felt this way to me. There was something truly special raging around the rooms, in the pubs, at sessions, as writers came together to learn, to share, to connect with others. That is so powerful.
As long as we never lose that, we can’t go wrong. That goes for AWCS as well.
We will continue to support new and emerging writers, while also giving opportunities to the more seasoned writer to share their expertise. Support works both ways and we couldn’t do any of what we do if we didn’t have the amazing instructors, mentors and editors that we do.

With special events like your Trans Day of Visibility program, AWCS proves that writing is not just about craft—it’s also about representation, storytelling, and activism. How do you see writing as a tool for social change, and how does AWCS foster these conversations?

I’m not even sure where to begin on this question. Writing is the biggest tool for change, for knowledge, for empowerment in an individual. If it wasn’t, there would be no need for book burning or book banning, social workers and therapists wouldn’t have been using it as a tool for healing for centuries.
There are some stories that stand the test of time: think of all the references to living in an “Orwellian world”, or The Handmaid’s Tale becoming reality. Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 is still as relevant today as it was during World War II. Stories can warn, stories can teach, stories can engage and instill empathy, stories can make us rage, cry, laugh, love. Stories can teach and with that comes knowledge and knowledge is power. There is not much else that can do all these things in one medium. It’s really quite amazing the power of words. But those words can’t all come from one voice and that’s what AWCS aims to do. Give space to all voices, because everyone has a story. Maybe they don’t know what it is yet and once we massage it out of them and that story changes one person’s way of thinking, then we have succeeded.

On top of all of this, you offer so many classes for a variety of levels of writer from emerging writers to people who have been writing for years. How do you determine which classes to choose and what programs would you like to see that you haven’t yet given?

I wish there was a magic formula when it comes to choosing classes but really it comes down to what’s relevant, what’s popular, what have people been asking for and what are people pitching? I’ve been doing this for more than 15-years and there are definitely patterns that emerge and so programming is designed to fit those patterns – such as we see the highest influx of new interest in September (back to school) and January (good old new year resolutions). The spring tends to be slower because the snow is melting, good weather on the horizon so we focus more on creativity-based programs and having fun, more community-building sessions, panels, guest speakers.
Unless there is something that I feel we are completely missing, we typically pull from proposals submitted by instructors. We try to avoid too much overlap in sessions, and each term, we attempt to minimize repeat classes running back-to-back unless they were super popular.
We don’t really know what we are missing until it’s submitted. I’m always on the lookout for proposals that excite me, that are different yet well thought out. On rare occasions, we’ll have an idea and then we’ll create it ourselves and find someone to teach it.

Bonus question: Have you ever taken a picture of a weird bird?

Stop judging me. I take too many selfies as it is.

Bonus Bonus Question: Even though you run this amazing organization, presumably you are also a writer. How do find the time and what are you working on?

My instinct is to say I don’t, because I spend all this time helping others, my work is my joy and how dare I take time for myself. It’s funny, it’s tragic and makes me look like such a hard-working person, giving to everyone else.
But the reality is, I write. I write all the time. Not always something dramatic and passionate and publishable, but I write.
My first novel came out in 2020. I’m working on a new novel that is almost done, but I have stalled out with the edits, I’ve lost a little joy and enthusiasm in the project, even though I still love the story and the characters. I’ve been spending some time writing personal essays and short stories and doing some freewriting for the sake of creativity, but with no real purpose. The other day I got a prompt that had to do with peas and it was silly at the time, but now I’ve come up with a new essay that is interesting to me and could actually go somewhere. One never knows where inspiration might strike them or what will resonate. That’s why I find writing equal parts challenging and hard work and fun and inspiring.

Robin van Eck is the Executive Director of the Alexandra Writers’ Centre Society and the author of Rough, a novel published in 2020. She can be found here.

Spring always feels like a time of waking up in my life. I deal with winter depression and in the darker, colder months, it sometimes feels as if I’m hibernating in my house, just trying to power through my to-do list, head down, eyes front. I feel as if very little new creativity comes out of me in the winter. And then boom. Spring comes and suddenly, I’m writing stories, coming up with new ideas for novels, finishing projects, getting excited again. This year, March came and it’s like the dam burst. I finally finished my novella-in-flash, Red Shirts Sometimes Survive, and sent it off to Off Topic Publishing with hopes of having that published this year.

My novel, ARTHUR UNDRESSED, came back from my agent with a glorious editorial letter, both deeply praiseful and also, full of a ton of work for me. That’s okay. I want this novel to be as perfect as possible. I’ve been powering through those edits and hope to have them finished by the end of this month.

And of course, because I don’t know how to not juggle several creative threads at once, I’ve also been writing and plotting new work. I’ve started working on my next novel. Thanks to a few sessions with my bestie and co-writer, Andrew Buckley, I have the new novel fully plotted. I love plotting but I always feel my map falls apart in the middle, so having a friend I can go to with a bunch of random ideas that he can help me form into a cohesive outline is wonderful. So now, the chapter outline is finished and I’ve written my first two chapters. Speaking of Andrew, we’re nearly done with our third collaborative book, this one a YA space pirates novel. Our queer Shakespeare series is currently being shopped, and we’ve written a proposal and chapter samples for a collaborative non-fiction book.

Meanwhile, last night I had the BEST IDEA for a new book… I made a few notes and left it alone because I need to finish these edits. Spring, man. Someone remind me of this next winter when I say, at some point, as I always do, I’ll NEVER be able to write anything ever again.

If you’re hoping to connect with me over the spring and summer of travel, please check out my website and subscribe to my mailing list. I’ve got in-person classes, conferences, and so very much travel. I’ll be teaching and speaking at several places in Canada over the spring and summer, and I’ll be in the UK again for the Flash Fiction Festival. Hope to see you!

Welcome to the 5 Questions Series. Each week, I’ll ask five questions of some of my favorite authors, editors, publishers, and other industry professionals. This week, I’m talking with Kendra Preston Leonard whose work in opera and academia challenges the status quo and uplifts voices too often left out.

Your academic and creative work both focus on bringing marginalized communities to the forefront. What are some of the biggest challenges you see in representation today, and how do you navigate them in your own work?

The hegemony of white men is still an issue in both academia and the arts. For example, in 2024, Houston Grand Opera premiered Intelligence, a new opera it had commissioned. The plot focused on the work of two women—one white, one Black—who ran a spy ring for the Union during the American Civil War. The opera included references to the Black woman’s African ancestors, and music that was meant to represent their soundscape. While HGO did bring in Jawole Willa Jo Zollarn, as the production’s choreographer, the composer and librettist were both white men—Jake Heggie and Gene Scheer. What made this story theirs to tell? I’m not saying that men can’t tell women’s stories, or that white people can’t write works about Black people, but in a story centered on women and with a significant scene depicting Africa, I’d at least have liked a woman or Black artist to have a major role in the creation of the words and music. This was a missed opportunity to showcase women or nonbinary creators who might have told a story that offered greater representation both on and off stage.
In my creative work, I write about what I know and believe in, and teach the same things. One of my operas with composer Jessica Rudman is an adaptation of my novella in verse Protectress. The opera is written for ten women or nonbinary singers. At a talkback after a workshop performance of the first act, someone asked if we were going to add characters who were men to it. We both said, “No.” And the person seemed very flummoxed. But I was thinking of Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s “When there are nine.” We don’t need men in that opera, just as the Supreme Court doesn’t need to have men on it. I’m very firm about what projects I take on being aligned with my own values. I’ve just finished the first draft of a libretto for an opera called This is Jane with composer Angela Elizabeth Slater about the famous Jane collective, a Chicago-based group of mostly women who provided illegal but safe abortions for as many as 11,000 people in the years leading up to the legalization of abortion in 1973 in Roe v Wade. The Janes are heroes, and that’s how I’m depicting them. I’m also showing them as the very diverse group they were—white, Black, Latine, disabled, old, young, of every size. And every libretto I write has a casting note attached: some state that certain characters must be sung by certain kinds of performers; others are broader and say that the roles can be sung by any kind of body: disabled bodies, trans bodies, fat bodies, any body. And the performing arts organizations groups I work with generally embrace that and support it. But we still have a long way to go, so I also encourage my colleagues and students who write for the stage to do the same. My current workshop participants—members of the Guerilla Opera Writers’ Collective—have really leaned into this, and I love it.
Academia—at least some fields—is much more welcoming of projects that center minoritized communities. Nonetheless, there remain biases against the disabled, the fat, and the neurodivergent. As a fat, disabled, autistic woman, I get pretty tired of reading books about people like me written by people who have no idea what it’s like to be any of these things, or who haven’t spoken with those of us who are. Fat activism and Fat Studies have been around since the 1960s, but fatness remains a socially acceptable thing to condemn or mock. Academia often points to the lack of available primary sources surrounding the lives and work of minoritized communities, but fortunately scholars are always developing new methodologies that can help counter this. For the last several years, I’ve been researching the role of women and BIPOC musicians in silent film music. This is an area in which not only are the primary sources written almost exclusively and biased in favor of white men, much of the secondary scholarly and popular literature to date is also biased in the same way. While I’ve been able to comb through primary sources and find a good deal of information about white women, finding BIPOC musicians of any gender has been difficult. Fortunately, there’s an approach used in film studies and other disciplines I can use: speculative historiography, in which scholars posit “what-if” scenarios based on what knowledge is available. This is widely used in history, media studies, gender studies, and other fields, but musicology—music historiography and theory—is always about 20 years behind everyone else in the humanities and so is less enthusiastic about the idea. But I persist. When I was teaching musicology more frequently, I also made sure that what I was teaching was as inclusive as possible, and I taught people to look really critically at the materials they were being taught to rely on for understanding music historiography and theory. On the first day of a class with a textbook I would never have chosen but which was foisted upon me by my chair, I asked students to look in it and tell me how many pages they had to go to find a non-white, non-man composer or other musician even mentioned. One woman shot her hand up: “eighty pages!” I told them to take their books back to the bookstore for full refunds. I didn’t get asked to teach there again, but every time I see one of those students, they remember that.
In both academia and the creative arts, I really want people to create and read or see or hear work that pushes them into activism, and I want publishers and institutions and performing groups to help facilitate it through talkbacks or initiatives that help the community. In 2018, when the new Queer Eye was aired, Tan France said, “The original show was fighting for tolerance. Our fight is for acceptance.” Well, my fight is to get people from saying “that’s fascinating and important” to “I’m gonna go donate/march/advocate for this issue.” I want people to set down my books or leave a performance venue and go actively do something that makes a difference. Program more music by nonbinary composers, give money or time to a mutual aid abortion fund group, teach your students equal numbers of pieces by white and BIPOC composers, volunteer at a crisis hotline. Write poetry, give readings, give books by nonbinary and women writers to your friends.

As an educator, what strategies do you use to encourage and support storytelling from those who may not see themselves reflected in traditional media?

Write what you want to see and hear and identify your allies in the world in which you want to work. You want better representation of queer folks on stage? Then your opera or play or musical or song cycle or whatever should focus on that—and truly embrace it. Don’t avoid a sex scene, a long kiss, an intimate moment just because some audience members might be uncomfortable. You’re not writing for them. You want better representation of mental illness on stage? Write from your own experiences but also interview other mentally ill people and let them read it and use their feedback. Be forthright and non-apologetic. Require that the main roles be sung by people who are mentally ill, and that any production have resources on hand to help performers if needed (trauma in opera and the ethics of care is something I’m just starting to write about but I’ll save it for now). I’m autistic and have an upcoming project with an autistic character. There are several plays and operas and other works out there that are “about” autism, in that a character or two “act” autistic (which is usually a set of behaviors defined by neurotypical people). Without the input of people who are Actually Autistic, these easily become caricatures. I want to change that by creating work that reflects my own and other people’s experiences as neurodivergent in a neurotypical world.
As for finding allies, I tell people to go to/watch lots of performances. Look at what the local arts organizations in your area have put on and go to performances by the ones that want to tell stories like yours. Tell performers and directors you like what they do, that it resonates with you. Join online groups and Discords and go to meetups, if you can. Finding your people can take time and can be hard, but there are people who really do want to hear the same stories that you want to tell. And often smaller organizations and groups are more in it for creating better spaces and places for minoritized communities than the big, rich organizations. The Metropolitan Opera only just got around to putting on an opera by a Black man, but the Opera Theatre of St. Louis has been premiering new works by composers and librettists of color for years. Director, singer, producer, and drag king extraordinaire Danielle Wright produces gender-swapped operas with trans singers. Omar Najmi and his husband Brendon Shapiro founded Catalyst New Music to produce Omar’s opera This is Not That Dawn, about the Partition of India, and to support the creation of new art song. You can find your people and tell your stories. Be patient and be engaged.

I’m absolutely fascinated with your background in opera and writing librettos. Do you see contemporary opera challenging the trope of the tragic or mad woman?

I wish there were more challenges to it. There are still far too many operas that are about women’s trauma and end with dead women on stage. I was at Opera America’s Women’s Opera Network online conference in March, and we talked about the continuing push by primarily white audiences for minoritized groups’ trauma to be central to any stories about that groups. There are, unfortunately, women librettists and composers writing about women’s trauma in exploitative ways, feeding audiences stories of how being a woman, and particularly a sexual woman, equates with death. We need more roles for women in opera in genera: my colleague Hillary LaBonte, found that of the operas written and premiered between 1995 and 2019, only 43% of the roles are for women, despite women vastly outnumbering men among graduates of schools with degrees in voice and opera. And few of these operas received second productions—this is common in the opera world—so these roles mostly go unknown and unsung.
Composer Kamala Sankaram has said that she works to refute the idea that strong women in opera have to die, and her opera Thumbprint (2009-14), with librettist Susan Yankowitz affirms that—in this work, the protagonist, the first Pakistani woman to see justice done for her rape, uses the settlement money from her case to start a school and refuge for other women. In Kaija Saariaho (composer) and Amin Maalouf (librettist)’s opera L’Amour de from 2000, it is the man in love who dies in the arms of the woman; she then enters a convent. In their 2006 opera Adriana Mater, the focus is on sisters who survive horrific treatment during a time of war in their country; and in Saariaho’s last opera, Innocence, which has a libretto by Sofi Oksanen, the women of the story are the strongest figures in it. Jennifer Higdon (composer) and Gene Scheer (librettist)’s opera Cold Mountain (2015), the character of Ada, a woman, lives while her lover, a man, dies. There are operas about same-sex relationships, of which Paula Kimper (composer) and Wende Persons (librettist)’s 1998 Patience and Sarah, is probably the best known. It has a genuinely happy and optimistic ending and deserves far more performances than it’s had. Ana Sokolović (composer) and Hannah Shepard (screenwriter)’s opera Svadba is for six women, and it too has a happy ending.

Addendum to the above question which I know means I’m cheating on the five questions theme here. How do you personally approach opera as an activist art form?

I ask myself (and my students) these questions: Why do you want to tell this story? Why do YOU want to tell this story/is this YOUR story to tell? Why do you want to tell THIS story? What’s your goal in telling the story? Who is your audience? And How does this work contribute to equity, inclusivity, and diversity in opera? So every time I get an idea for an opera libretto, I put myself through these questions. That’s step one, checking to determine if it really is activist.
Step two is focusing on stories that can actually educate or change people’s minds or do social justice work. My opera Protectress is about pushing back against victim-blaming in sexual violence and recognizing that in a patriarchy, women aren’t always raised to be each other’s allies. I want people to leave that thinking about how to be anti-rape, how to be supportive of victims. I have a work in progress on the 504 Sit-Ins, an important event in disability history in the US. Disability activists, Black Panthers (some abled, some disabled), clergy of different faiths, all sorts of people came together in San Francisco and held a sit-in in government offices until the government did its job regarding accessibility and accommodations. It’s designed to get people thinking about how disability rights benefit everyone and taking action to support those rights.
Step three is writing for the widest possible range of performers as I can. You may have noticed in my answer above about tragic or madwomen in opera that none of the operas I mentioned have roles explicitly for or even indicating that it would be ok for them to be sung by trans and nonbinary performers, and that’s a big problem. The opera world is full of trans and nonbinary vocalists, and opera creators need to make room and make roles for them. I encourage my colleagues and students in libretto writing to write characters that can be performed by anyone who wants to perform that role and to specifically create inclusive works. I was so happy when a workshop participant recently specified that major roles in their libretto “must be cast with non-binary and/or plus-size performer[s].” This also holds for disabled, fat, and neurodivergent performers. I include language for this at the top of every libretto: “the librettist encourages the intentional casting of diverse performers including those who are plus-size, disabled, nonbinary, trans, or have any other kind of marginalized bodies. Stage directions involving movement and touch should be freely adapted by and for disabled performers as they prefer.” If I have the luxury of getting a say in casting and working with the director or a production of one of my works, I make a point to go over this with them and lean into it in casting.
Step four is pairing the work with partners who will benefit from it and inform it. I try to partner with organizations that will benefit from the work. For my piece “My Skin,” with composer Angela Elizabeth Slater, we use the story of the mythical selkie to address domestic/intimate partner violence and the need for resources for it, we’re doing outreach about domestic/intimate partner violence at performances and I give royalties I make from the sale of the piece to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Another piece in works about mental health will work closely with support organizations.
Step five is teaching. Very few librettists have had any sort of formal training about the art form and all of the issues that go along with writing for opera today, and I want new librettists to have deep knowledge of what they’re getting into as activist artists. I’m the Teaching Artist in Libretto Writing with Guerilla Opera, which bills itself as “a punk ensemble that embodies are that emerges from those who challenge the status quo. We engage in rebellious works of opera theater, question the established norms, and call for radical change.” This my ethos as well. Be punk, do opera. Or should it be do opera, be punk? Anyway, I also base a lot of my teaching philosophy and praxis on anti-racist and other anti-bigotry writing approaches, drawing from Felicia Rose Chavez’s The Anti-Racist Writing Workshop and Matthew Salesses’s Craft in the Real World. This is the ethical way forward in any kind of creative writing.

I’m thrilled you’re a fan of flash fiction and I love the idea that both flash fiction and librettos require precision and conveying big ideas in small spaces. What lessons can librettists learn from studying flash fiction?

Everything! Flash relies on compressing a ton of information into a small space, and/or focusing on only what’s essential to the immediate story. In the opening scene of an opera, audiences need to get an idea of who the characters are, where they are in both time and space, and what’s going on in fairly quick order. Flash writers are excellent at setting up the frame of the story very quickly. Flash is also good for helping librettists think about non-Western and non-traditional narrative structures, because there’s so much flash that plays with conventions and experiments with form in storytelling. A new exercise I used recently was to ask librettists to tell their story in 100 words or fewer. We practiced with operas from the inherited repertoire—the pre-1950 operas that most opera companies perform today—and it was fun and revealing and got us all thinking about how we communicate within limits like time and space.

What additional shifts would you like to see in how historically excluded people are represented across media, including in opera, flash fiction and beyond?

More, more, more. More representation, more stories about joy within the lives of people from historically excluded communities, not just trauma. More depictions of how people from such groups live and thrive and innovate and simply are. In the opera world, directors have (mostly) rightly done away with blackface, and I want it to be equally taboo for a disabled character to be played by anyone other than a disabled performer, for a fat character to be played by anyone other than a fat person, and so on. I also want to see disabled, fat, nonbinary, BIPOC, or trans performers in roles that have traditionally gone to straight, abled, cis, white people. Give me a fat Jo in Little Women, give me a disabled Milica in Svadba, give me trans performers in Kate Soper’s Here Be Sirens (2014). Also, no inspiration porn.

Bonus question: Have you ever taken a picture of a weird bird?

Does it have to be a real bird? This weird bird sculpture was my mom’s and she adored it. For a long time I thought it was hideous, but I grew to love it. My spouse and I drove 17 hours each way to fetch it when I inherited it, and now it hangs out with my books.

You can find me and links to Kendra Preston Leonard’s stuff (including a werewolf version of All’s Well That Ends Well, lots of poetry, and audio/video and scores for operas and songs here.

New libretto writing classes opening soon! More information available here.

This week’s Five Questions With guest is a little different. I’ve interviewed debut authors, seasoned pros, and writers across genres but today I’m turning the metaphorical mic inward to answer some of the questions you’ve asked about the series itself. If you’ve ever wondered how people end up in this feature or why I keep asking writers about weird birds… this one’s for you.


How do I get featured in the Five Questions With… series?
Honestly? Ask me! I love featuring writers at all stages, especially folks who are queer, Canadian, emerging, mid-career, or have a book baby they want to celebrate. You don’t need an agent or a publisher to qualify. Just send me a note through my website and I’ll send over the questions. Easier than deciding whether to put jam or cream first on your scone.

How many books do I need to have written to be on this blog?
None. If you have something interesting that is writing-adjacent, I’m happy to consider that. Have you done a ton of research on feminine rage in 18th century literature? Did you do your doctoral thesis on upending the traditional MLA workshop structure? I love talking about weird writing related topics.

3. Why do you always ask people if they’ve taken a picture of a weird bird?
Because weird birds are funny. And wonderful. And also—I firmly believe that every writer has either literally or literaturely (I know that isn’t a word but here we are) taken a picture of a bird. Some have talked about bird motifs in their work. Some have sent pictures of decidedly NOT weird birds. Also, it makes people laugh. And also, for real, because Marion Lougheed, during one of the earliest interviews for this blog series, randomly sent me a picture of a weird bird to accompany her post. I’m still not sure why, but I am hear for it.

4. Do you edit people’s answers?
Only for clarity, spelling, or formatting. I don’t cut content or change anyone’s voice. I want to showcase your voice, not subvert it.

5. What are you hoping people get out of this series?
I hope you find a new writer to love. I hope you feel seen, inspired, or just have a little laugh over your morning tea. Writers need community, and I hope this series reminds people they’re not alone in the weird, beautiful mess of making stories.(AND I REALLY WANT TO SEE YOUR WEIRD BIRDS! Also I’m never sad when people send pics of their cats.)

Want to be featured?
Drop me a line. All writers welcome—especially if you’ve taken a picture of a weird bird.